Skip to content
DomDetailer
Majestic metrics

Citation Flow explained: link influence needs context

Citation Flow describes link influence. Pair it with Trust Flow and referring-domain evidence to understand what is driving a candidate’s score.

Updated · DomDetailer

What Citation Flow measures

Majestic Citation Flow is a 0–100 score that models influence through the link graph. It is not simply the number of backlinks. Links contribute different weight, and Majestic's calculations take relationships between pages into account. DomDetailer returns the score as majesticCF.

CF gives useful context to Trust Flow: popularity and link quality can move differently. A substantial gap creates a question to investigate, rather than a verdict about spam.

Separate score, link count and diversity

Keep three columns visible when screening a list: CF, total external links and referring domains. CF is a modelled score; the other two are counts. A hundred links on one referring website still represent one referring domain.

Illustrative example: 12,000 backlinks from 40 referring domains average 300 links per domain. That may reflect repeated navigation or footer placements. It does not tell you that 12,000 independent publishers endorsed the site. Another candidate with 1,200 links from 300 domains has a different pattern even if the scores are close.

Check the rows behind large concentrations. Repeated links can be perfectly ordinary on a useful resource. Shared IPs or subnets can also arise from hosting arrangements; neither repeated links nor shared hosting alone proves a coordinated network.

When CF is much higher than TF

Open a selection of referring pages and ask why those links exist. Are they editorial references, directories, forum discussions, sitewide templates or automated pages? Do their topics relate to the destination? Do the destination URLs still work?

Review anchors and target pages together. Hundreds of identical anchors to a page that no longer exists raise different questions from diverse references to a maintained resource. Preserve a reason for the review outcome, including unresolved questions.

A high CF can put a candidate near the top of a list for investigation. It should not skip the investigation. A very low CF can also be legitimate for a small or new site; it does not make the name unusable for a fresh project.

A repeatable bulk CF review

  1. Deduplicate your domain list before paid requests.
  2. Fetch CF and TF together in the bulk domain metrics checker.
  3. Use a TF/CF ratio as a review aid and keep the original scores.
  4. Compare referring domains, topic and link counts; label uncertain candidates for manual review.
  5. Inspect the individual backlink rows for the remaining candidates.

1,000 unique successful requests consume 1,000 credits. That is about $0.79–$1.36 in consumed credit value at the current pack rates. Credits are bought in packs: the entry pack is $34 for 25,000 credits. This is not a $0.79 checkout option. Compare the current DomDetailer credit packs.

Questions

Is Citation Flow the number of backlinks?

No. It is a Majestic score from 0 to 100. Raw backlink counts and referring-domain counts are separate fields.

Should I reject every domain with CF greater than TF?

No. Compare relevant candidates and investigate the link profile. The relationship can help set review priorities but cannot prove abuse by itself.

Sources and further reading

Continue your research

Start at 25,000 lookups for $34.

One balance covers the browser tools, the desktop app and the API. Nothing renews, nothing expires, and you can stop using it for six months without losing anything.